Highlights of 2024

Here are some of the highlights of ACCR’s efforts and impact over this year. Without all of you, this work is not possible.

Active ownership delivers outcomes: BHP improves scope 3 disclosures and investors withdraw resolution

The resolution was co-filed by Denmark's largest pension fund, PFA Pension Fund, and Vision Super, along with ACCR. It asked BHP for greater transparency about its forward plans and investments for Scope 3 emissions reductions from the steel value chain, and was withdrawn following enhanced disclosures in the company’s 2024 Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP).

BHP’s Scope 3 emissions, dominated by the processing of its iron ore and metallurgical coal into steel, account for 97% of its total emissions footprint.

“BHP has clearly heard that investors want greater insights into how it is tackling the critical issue of steel decarbonisation and has taken an important step forward,” said Company Strategy Lead, Naomi Hogan. “The disclosure provided by BHP on its planned investment in steel decarbonisation is vitally important because it allows shareholders to better assess how the company is positioning for the green steel transformation.”

ACCR’s analysis of BHP’s CTAP finds that while transparency has improved, the disclosed plan falls short on ambition and does not have a capital allocation strategy to match the scale of the decarbonisation challenge. At the upcoming AGM on 30 October, shareholders will have a one in three year opportunity to vote on BHP’s CTAP: ACCR will be voting “against”.

Rio Tinto’s anti-climate advocacy prompts ACCR to disengage from policy collaboration

In August, ACCR made the difficult yet necessary decision to disengage from year-long discussions with Rio Tinto on improving its climate-related lobbying. This followed revelations the company engaged in negative advocacy that undermines a public commitment to an enhanced approach to climate advocacy.

The fact that Rio Tinto undertook lobbying of the Australian Government only came to light due to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request from Greenpeace Australia Pacific.

“We will not participate in engagements that could rightly be perceived as greenwashing,” ACCR Company Strategy Lead, Naomi Hogan said. “The fact it [Rio Tinto] has provided a public commitment highlighting the need for greater transparency and the critical role of government policy signals in decarbonisation, and has then gone against this commitment behind closed doors, is hypocritical and a breach of trust.

Brynn wins Environmental Finance’s “Sustainability thought leader of the year, APAC” award

Independently judged by a panel of investors and industry experts, the Environmental Finance Sustainable Company Awards recognise industry excellence across the world stage. We were very pleased - though not surprised - to learn that Brynn is the recipient of this years’ “Sustainability thought leader of the year” award for the Asia-Pacific region.

ACCR calls Glencore to account as it holds on to coal

When the world’s largest publicly listed coal producer announced it was no longer proceeding with plans to demerge its coal operations, ACCR appeared widely in international media - calling on the company to explain its plans for managing its increased exposure to climate transition risk.

Over a (very busy) 24 hours, Company Strategy Lead, Naomi Hogan appeared in The TimesAgence France-PresseThe AustralianThe Telegraphthe Financial Times and BBC’s World Business Report.

Majority vote against Woodside’s climate strategy

At Woodside’s 2024 AGM in April, a majority (58.4%) of shareholders voted against the company’s climate plan - the largest ‘no’ vote ever under the global ‘Say on Climate’ mechanism. A record-breaking 16.61% of shareholders also voted against the re-election of Chair Richard Goyder, smashing the previous highest dissenting vote against a Woodside Chair of 1.6%.

These results follow four years of pressure from shareholders, including ACCR, asking the company to improve its management of climate risk. This latest climate plan from Woodside was rejected by all major proxy advisory firms, at least three major Australian superannuation funds, some of the United States’ biggest pension funds, Norway’s largest private pension fund, and Britain’s biggest asset manager.

ACCR filed a members’ statement at the AGM against the re-election of Richard Goyder, outlining why we think as Chair, he should be held accountable for Woodside’s current approach. In our view, it is inconceivable for Richard Goyder’s board to continue its trend of dismissing shareholder concerns following this overwhelming rejection of Woodside’s climate plan.

Shell commits to shedding light on emerging market lobbying

In a major pivot, Shell plc announced in April that it will disclose information about its climate and energy lobbying activities in 5-10 of the emerging markets where it does significant business. As revealed by ACCR’s report, In the dark: gaps in Shell’s climate lobbying disclosures, the company has been failing to make these disclosures. Our research identified multiple examples of undisclosed lobbying by Shell and its industry associations, including for policies that risk locking in levels of fossil fuel demand misaligned with the Paris goals.

ACCR has been engaging with Shell on this issue, backed by our research, and along with institutional investors KLP and Sampension, co-filed a shareholder resolution asking the company to provide a global account of its material, direct and indirect, climate and energy-related lobbying. Following the commitment from Shell, the resolution was withdrawn.

Rio Tinto commits to improved disclosure of plans to rein in emissions

Following direct engagement by ACCR and institutional investors in Australia and Europe, Rio Tinto committed to enhancing its disclosures on how it plans to reduce scope 3 emissions from processing iron for steel production - a commitment that sets a new standard for iron ore producers globally.

Scope 3 emissions, predominantly from steel making, account for more than 95% of the total emissions footprint of iron ore miners, posing significant business risks in a decarbonising global economy. Rio’s investors will now be ahead of the curve in understanding how the company is planning to tackle this challenge.

Sustained pressure on the coal sector delivers emissions reductions


In May, Japan’s largest coal power operator, J-POWER, announced it would close five coal power generation units within domestic coal plants by FY2030, following two years of shareholder pressure. We estimate collectively these five coal unit closures will prevent the release of 16.2Mt of CO2 per year.

ACCR has been engaging with J-POWER for a number of years. In 2022 and 2023, along with institutional investors, we escalated to co-filing shareholder proposals at the company’s AGM - with the proposals receiving significant support. This welcome announcement by J-POWER shows the company understands its strategy needs to evolve in line with investor expectations.

Shareholders deliver Japan’s largest ever vote in support of climate lobbying resolution

Investors in Nippon Steel, the world’s fourth largest steelmaker, gave significant support for three climate-related shareholder proposals at the company’s AGM - including delivering the largest ever vote in support of a climate lobbying resolution in Japan.

Two of the proposals were co-filed by ACCR and Corporate Action Japan, and one by Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and ACCR. Given the significant support, improving and accelerating its decarbonisation strategy should now be a focus for Nippon Steel’s board.

Meet Lily Jovic

Lily, who is now a shareholder with BHP, Santos and Woodside, says “ACCR’s impact motivated me.”

Read More

Too many mavericks are barely enough

It’s critically important that people speak up and challenge the status quo. One way to think about Mavericks is that these are the people who buck group trends. They speak their minds and make their own decisions.

Read More

What do we need to know about stranded assets?

Stranded assets existed before the need to consider the risks of climate change, like when typewriters were replaced by computers, but new situations have emerged that can cause assets to lose value earlier than envisioned.

Read More